Lebanon Debates Disarming Hezbollah Amid Fears of Civil War

Lebanon is grappling with the question of whether to attempt disarming Hezbollah, a powerful militant group and political faction, amid escalating internal tensions and a prolonged economic crisis. The debate has resurfaced following recent clashes and political deadlock, with some factions arguing that Hezbollah's weapons undermine state sovereignty, while others warn that any attempt to disarm could trigger a violent conflict. The country has been without a president for months, and its institutions are weakened by corruption and financial collapse. Hezbollah, backed by Iran, remains a dominant force, and its disarmament is a red line for many of its supporters. The discussion reflects deeper sectarian divisions and fears of a repeat of the 1975-1990 civil war. No official decision has been made, but the topic is increasingly central to political discourse.

Global Impact

Economically, a Lebanese civil war would deepen the country's existing financial collapse, potentially triggering a sovereign default and regional banking contagion. Politically, it would destabilize an already fragile Middle East, drawing in Iran and Israel through proxy dynamics.